Wikinotizie:Regola dei tre ripristini: differenze tra le versioni
Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
Nessun oggetto della modifica |
libero i commenti e ricomincio la traduzione |
||
Riga 17:
==Ripristino e vandalismo==
Se credi che tu abbia ripristinato molte volte i vandalismi di uno stesso indirizzo IP o di un utente bannato, è meglio che tu ti rivolga ad un amministratore per bloccarlo secondo le politiche vigenti.
:''The three revert rule is not generally considered to apply to reversions of simple vandalism by users who are waiting for a sysop to block the IP, of course. Generally, sysops need not revert a simple vandal even twice, because they should have been blocked already by that time. (However, sometimes sysops will validly choose not to block the IP out of a fear of affecting innocent users, and this can be valid as well.) But in some cases, it can happen that simple vandalism makes it through three reverts; the rule should not be interpreted to mean that such vandalism must be left standing by a user who has already reverted three times. Use this exception cautiously—it is better to just make sure the vandal is blocked when possible. And make sure it's simple vandalism by the usual definition.''
:''This exception does not apply to reversions of well-established users just because you consider their edits to be "vandalism." Simple vandalism is indisputable—don't confuse it with edits which you simply disagree with.''
'''If you violate the three revert rule, after your fourth [[W:Wikipedia:Revert|revert]] in 24 hours, admins may block you for up to 24 hours. In the cases where multiple parties violate the rule, admins should treat all sides equally. <!-- Consensus not reached yet for addition of following statement into this policy: Administrators should document 3RR violations and blocks on [[Wikinews:Admin action alerts]] using the provided template.'''
*Educating users who may not be aware of good Wikinews practice in the matter.
*Peer pressure and leadership by example.
*Where pages are protected due to revert wars, admins may protect pages on the version disliked by those who have engaged in excessive reverts. This is believed by some to be a recent change to the [[Wikinews:Protection policy|protection policy]]. The admin also has the option to protect the current version, thereby maintaining a sense of neutrality.
Le violazioni della regola dei tre ripristini possono essere riportate in [[Wikinotizie:Amministratori/Richieste_amministrative]].
| |||